翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Tennis News ・ Tennis no Ōjisama – Futari no Samurai ・ Tennis on CBS ・ Tennis on ESPN ・ Tennis on HBO ・ Tennis on Hughes ・ Tennis on NBC ・ Tennis on TNT ・ Tennis on USA ・ Tennis performance timeline comparison ・ Tennis performance timeline comparison (men) ・ Tennis performance timeline comparison (women) ・ Tennis performance timeline comparison (women) (1884–1977) ・ Tennis players with most titles in the Open Era ・ Tennis polo ・ Tennis racket theorem ・ Tennis records of the Open Era – men's singles ・ Tennis records of the Open Era – women's singles ・ Tennis Round ・ Tennis scoring system ・ Tennis Shoes Adventure Series ・ Tennis shots ・ Tennis South Invitational ・ Tennis Stadium (Berlin) ・ Tennis Stadium Kitzbühel ・ Tennis strategy ・ Tennis technology ・ Tennis the Menace ・ Tennis tour ・ Tennis tournament records and statistics Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Tennis racket theorem ： ウィキペディア英語版 Tennis racket theorem The tennis racket theorem or intermediate axis theorem is a result in classical mechanics describing the movement of a rigid body with three distinct principal moments of inertia. It is also dubbed the Dzhanibekov effect, after Russian astronaut Vladimir Dzhanibekov who discovered the theorem's consequences while in space in 1985.〔(Эффект Джанибекова (гайка Джанибекова) ), 23 July 2009 〕 An article explaining the effect was published in 1991. The theorem describes the following effect: rotation of an object about its first and third principal axes is stable, while rotation about its second principal axis (or intermediate axis) is not. This can be demonstrated with the following experiment: hold a tennis racket at its handle, with face horizontal, and try to throw it in the air so that it will perform a full rotation about the horizontal axis perpendicular to the handle, and try to catch the handle. In almost all cases, during that rotation the face will also have completed a half rotation, so that the other face is now up. By contrast, it is easy to throw the racket so that it will rotate about the handle axis (the third principal axis) without accompanying half-rotation about another axis; it is also possible to make it rotate about the vertical axis perpendicular to the handle (the first principal axis) without any accompanying half-rotation. The experiment can be performed with any object that has three different moments of inertia, for instance with a book or a remote control. The effect occurs whenever the axis of rotation differs slightly from the object's second principal axis; air resistance or gravity are not necessary. == Qualitative discussion == The tennis racket theorem can be qualitatively analysed with the help of Euler's equations. Under torque free conditions, they take the following form: :$$ \begin I_1\dot_&=(I_2-I_3)\omega_2\omega_3~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\text\\ I_2\dot_&=(I_3-I_1)\omega_3\omega_1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\text\\ I_3\dot_&=(I_1-I_2)\omega_1\omega_2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\text \end Here $I\_1,\; I\_2,\; I\_3$ denote the object's principal moments of inertia, and we assume $I\_1\; >\; I\_2\; >\; I\_3$. The angular velocities about the object's three principal axes are $\backslash omega\_1,\; \backslash omega\_2,\; \backslash omega\_3$ and their time derivatives are denoted by $\backslash dot\backslash omega\_1,\; \backslash dot\backslash omega\_2,\; \backslash dot\backslash omega\_3$. Consider the situation when the object is rotating about axis with moment of inertia $I\_1$. To determine the nature of equilibrium, assume small initial angular velocities along the other two axes. As a result, according to equation (1), $~\backslash dot\_$ is very small. Therefore the time dependence of $~\backslash omega\_1$ may be neglected. Now, differentiating equation (2) and substituting $\backslash dot\_3$ from equation (3), :$$ \begin I_2 I_3 \ddot_&= (I_3-I_1) (I_1-I_2)(\omega_1)^2\omega_\\ \text~~~~ \ddot_2 &= \text \times \omega_2 \end Note that $\backslash omega\_2$ is being opposed and so rotation around this axis is stable for the object. Similar reasoning gives that rotation around axis with moment of inertia $I\_3$ is also stable. Now apply the same analysis to axis with moment of inertia $I\_2$. This time $\backslash dot\_$ is very small. Therefore the time dependence of $~\backslash omega\_2$ may be neglected. Now, differentiating equation (1) and substituting $\backslash dot\_3$ from equation (3), :$$ \begin I_1 I_3 \ddot_&= (I_2-I_3) (I_1-I_2) (\omega_)^2\omega_1\\ \text~~~~ \ddot_1 &= \text \times \omega_1 \end Note that $\backslash omega\_1$ is ''not'' opposed (and therefore will grow) and so rotation around the 2 axis is ''unstable''. Therefore even a small disturbance along other axes causes the object to 'flip'. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Tennis racket theorem」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.